Harmeet Dhillon’s Bold Confession: Why She’s Ditching Popularity and What That Means for Her Future

Harmeet Dhillon’s Bold Confession: Why She’s Ditching Popularity and What That Means for Her Future

So, Monday threw us a real curveball at Tiger Beat on the Potomac—first up, a glowing portrait of Representative Jim Jordan, the upcoming Republican House minority’s supposed powerhouse. I mean, seriously, who hasn’t heard that tune played before? Then—bam!—a spotlight on Harmeet Dhillon, the “wing nut” steering the DOJ’s civil-rights division, with a promise to “turn the train around and drive it the opposite way.” Now, if that doesn’t set your political radar spinning, what will? It’s like watching a thriller where the protagonists are more like firebrands, each carving their own lane through America’s culture wars. Makes you wonder: in the chaos of shifting powers and “woke ideology” battles, who’s really steering the ship? Buckle up—it’s gonna be a bumpy ride. LEARN MORE

Estimated read time4 min read

Oh, it was beat-sweetener day on Monday at Tiger Beat on the Potomac. First we got a story about what a powerhouse Representative Jim Jordan (R-Van Heusen) is going to be in the upcoming Republican House minority. (Lips, God’s ear, etc.). Then we get a profile of Harmeet Dhillon, the wing nut in charge of the Department of Justice’s civil-rights division. And we’re off.

When Harmeet Dhillon cites the “woke ideology” she wants to put in the U.S. Justice Department’s sights, she does so from a personal familiarity perhaps unrivaled in the conservative movement. Dhillon—a figure likely to emerge with new power from President Donald Trump’s shakeup of the department’s leadership—built her legal career and political identity in San Francisco, where she was a Republican activist vastly outnumbered by Democrats and led a legal revolt against California’s progressive policies in state and federal courts.

Wow, she’s not a local political nuisance. She’s a freedom fighter.

“The entirety of my career has been a minority, conservative viewpoint in a very liberal profession,” Dhillon told POLITICO in a recent interview. “I’m not here for a popularity contest.”

Well, there’s no danger of that.

“Harmeet Dhillon always seemed to me to be the obvious AG,” commentator Mike Cernovich wrote hours after Trump removed Bondi, amid a flurry of similar social media posts from likeminded MAGA-aligned voices online. “If this isn’t locked down, she’s definitely someone most supported by the base.”

Nice sourcing, TBOTP. The country always benefits from the insights of the Pizzagate guy. Yes, he speaks for the Base, but the Base is made up of angry meat puppets who have poisoned American politics for the foreseeable future and it’s time the Base was covered that way.

Dhillon gained national notice because she was a local outlier, driving culture-war wedges in California battles over diversity, free speech and Covid closures. She has since run a year-long campaign to transform the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and its place in American society. Dhillon says her vision is not just to slow down progressive civil rights aims but “turning the train around and driving in the opposite direction,” as she told the conservative Federalist Society after her appointment.

What might that “opposite direction” be? The shade of Bull Connor anxiously awaits.

Those who have witnessed Dhillon’s rise in California argue the lone-wolf contrarianism she showed there makes her a perfect candidate to help lead a department that Trump has come to treat as something of a personal law office.

Jesus H. Christ on an amicus brief. How anybody can write that is such a neutral way after the past five months, let alone after five of the past ten years, is beyond me.

Dhillon became known nationally for sharp-elbowed appearances on cable news and social media posts flaming liberal opponents. Privately, friends say, she has a fun and dry sense of humor. A prolific knitter, she often surprises those close to her with scarves and other homespun apparel.

Mmmmmm, such sweet beats.

As for Jordan, the evidence is that he has been a blight on representative government for the entire El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago era of American politics. He led the fight against Impeachment I. And when the mob surged toward the House doors on January 6, Liz Cheney told him to fck off. As chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, he’s hunted more snipes than should be healthy for any man. For TBOTP, that’s enough to think of him as the man of the hour with an air of great power.

But things could be different in November. For one, in a race for minority leader, Jordan would only need to win over a majority of House Republicans—not a majority of the entire chamber. And while someone with a reputation as a “legislative terrorist”—as former Speaker John Boehner once called Jordan—might not make for a great speaker in the eyes of some members, leading a House minority can require a more confrontational approach. One Republican lawmaker granted anonymity to speak candidly noted that a bad midterm showing could actually work to Jordan’s advantage by culling some of his moderate opposition. “His base is in rock-hard GOP districts,” the member said. “The worse the night the fewer the number of ‘never Jordans’ who come to vote.”

But that member was among several who recognized that Jordan has also taken pains in the two-and-a-half years since he lost to build support in new corners of the House GOP: “He is working every day to lay the groundwork.” Republicans have asked Jordan to come to their districts and help with both big- and small-dollar donations, one person familiar with the outreach said. Jordan in the interview noted he was about to head to California to campaign with Rep. Vince Fong—a protege of McCarthy’s who is hardly considered a conservative rabble-rouser. “He’s definitely broadened his circle and his approach and his appeal,” said a swing-district GOP lawmaker, who like the others was granted anonymity to comment on a leadership race that has yet to actually materialize.

Brave soul, that one.

If you’re wondering what the post-midterm-election political coverage is going to be like, this might be worth remembering.

Post Comment

WIN $500 OF SHOPPING!

    This will close in 0 seconds