Unlock the Hidden Power Moves: Which Global Tracker Fund Will Multiply Your Wealth While Others Flounder?
Ever wonder if it’s possible to own a piece of the global economy without needing a PhD in finance or a Wall Street trading desk? Well, that’s exactly what a global tracker fund lets you do — it wraps up your entire equity diversification into one neat package. Think of it as the ultimate all-you-can-invest buffet, where instead of piling your plate high with just a few dishes, you get a taste of thousands of world-class companies from every corner of the planet. In this post, I’m gonna cut through the noise and show you how to pick the global tracker fund that suits your investment palette perfectly — no fluff, just what truly matters. Plus, I’ll share my top picks from the crowded field so you can dive straight in with confidence. Ready to simplify your investment game and potentially boost your financial future? Let’s get to it. LEARN MORE
A global tracker fund takes care of all your equity diversification needs in a single investment product.
In this post, we’ll explain how to choose the best global tracker fund for you. We’ll also list our top picks from the choices on offer.
What is a tracker fund?
A tracker fund is an investment fund that tracks an index like the S&P 500 for the US or, in the case of a global tracker, an index such as the FTSE All World.
Your money is pooled alongside the global tracker’s many other participants. Together this capital is invested by the fund’s management team into every major stock market on the planet.
As an investor in an index fund, you get a slice of ownership in thousands of world-class firms. As a result you buy into the prospects of entire industries, countries, and continents at a stroke.
An index followed by a global tracker fund is essentially an international league table of the world’s leading companies, from Apple to Nvidia to Taiwanese semiconductor giant TSMC.
Global tracker funds hold stocks to replicate their chosen index as faithfully as possible. The index meanwhile is driven by the fortunes of its constituent firms. Over the long-term, company valuations rise and fall consonant with their performance, investor sentiment, and global capital’s best estimate of their future earnings.
Investing this way is known as index investing or passive investing. We believe it’s the best strategy for most people to choose to maximise their chances of meeting their financial goals.
Investing giants like Warren Buffet recommend index funds. Even some ex-hedge fund managers have switched sides and urge everyday investors to pick global index trackers!
Global tracker funds – what really matters?
All-World – Most products labelled world index funds only encompass developed world countries. They skip the emerging markets, including the likes of China and India.
Such ‘world index trackers’ are less representative of the global economy. Instead look for ‘All-World’ or ‘Global’ index funds that include emerging markets.
Alternatively, if you do choose a developed world solution, you can add an emerging market index fund to your portfolio to make up the difference.
Diversification – Following on from the above, compare how many stocks your shortlist of global tracker funds includes. The more the better, because your index fund will then do a better job of representing the global stock markets that it follows.
Cost – This is the most important factor that will impact your returns and that you can control. There’s often little performance differential between global index trackers. If in doubt, pick the cheapest by Ongoing Charge Figure (OCF) / Total Expense Ratio (TER).
Reassuringly-expensive price tags will not secure you a better global equity tracker fund. Go for cheap, vanilla flavour trackers. Don’t worry about bells and whistles.
Don’t fret about small changes in cost, either. An OCF differential of 0.1% on £10,000 is just £10.
For example, if you had £50,000 in a fund with an OCF of 0.25% that would cost you:
£50,000 x 0.0025 = £125 annually.
Whereas a similar fund rocking an OCF of 0.15% would set you back £75 per year in charges.
Of course, only you can know your personal hassle threshold. Try to work out whether the impact of costs over your investing lifetime is worth switching.
Investor compensation – You’re covered for up to £85,000 if your global index fund is based in the UK. ETFs are not included. Note, investor compensation schemes only kick in if fund manager goes bust and your money disappears. Stock market losses are not covered! (Your broker is also covered by the same FSCS scheme. If the broker goes pop then ETFs and offshore index trackers are protected, so as long as your platform qualifies for the scheme.
The index – You should look up the tracker’s index to make sure it’s truly global. If it isn’t, find out what’s missing. Check your product’s factsheet, too.
Global index fund or global ETF?
Disclosure: Links to platforms may be affiliate links, where we may earn a commission. This article is not personal financial advice. When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. With commission-free brokers other fees may apply. See terms and fees. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.
ETFs and index funds are both types of index tracker. They’re both excellent ways of diversifying your investments across the globe for an amazingly low cost.
We’re equally happy using ETFs or index funds. We include both in our best global tracker fund table below.
The only time the fund type is a deal breaker is if:
- You want your tracker to be covered by the FSCS compensation scheme. If so, then check this list of UK-domiciled index funds, including global options.
- Your stockbroker charges an ETF dealing fee that costs more than 1% of your typical transaction value.
- The same broker enables you to trade index funds for free.
In the latter case, we’d invest in a global index fund in preference to the global ETF. That’s because the impact of a high dealing fee is surprisingly damaging over the long-term.
See our cheap broker comparison table for more. Percentage-fee brokers often allow you to trade global index funds for nothing.
Quite a few brokers also enable you to trade global equity ETFs for £0, too. Check out InvestEngine, Freetrade, Vanguard, Dodl, Prosper, and Lightyear for that option.
Best global tracker funds – compared
Source: Morningstar and fund provider’s data
There is very little to choose between these five global equity trackers:
- SPDR’s All Country World Index tracker is the cheapest. Hence it tops the table.
- The SPDR and iShares ETF follow MSCI indexes whereas the others follow a FTSE index. The indexes vary somewhat in country composition but have performed identically over the past decade.
- Vanguard’s Global All Cap index fund has about 6% small cap exposure. It’s therefore more diversified than the rest.
The reality is these shades of grey haven’t made much difference to results over the longer term. More on that in a moment.
Ch-ch-changes…
There are two relatively new entrants into the global tracker fund market to keep an eye on. They’re low cost but they haven’t had time to build a track record yet:
- Amundi Prime All Country World ETF – OCF 0.07% (The cheapest global tracker fund available.)
- Invesco FTSE All World ETF – OCF 0.15%
I’ll also throw two other choices into the pot because they do something a little different:
Vanguard’s LifeStrategy funds include a UK equity bias of around 20%. That compares to a 3% UK allocation for the true global index trackers in the table. You could choose LifeStrategy 100 if home bias suits your situation. Go for LifeStrategy 20-80 if you want an all-in-one fund that includes government bonds.
(Vanguard has also recently launched a ‘LifeStrategy Global’ range. These funds are the same deal as the regular LifeStrategy range, minus the home bias.)
The Fidelity fund is actively managed. It features a REIT exposure and small cap allocation of about 10%.
Both are funds-of-funds. They manage their asset allocation by holding other index trackers instead of trading the shares of listed firms.
Here’s a useful piece on how to compare index trackers.
Best global tracker funds – results check

Source: Trustnet’s Multi-plot Charting tool
I’m most interested in the 10-year annualised (nominal) returns for the global tracker selection above because that’s the longest comparison period we have for most of the funds in the mix.
I’ve underlined the 10-year returns of the MSCI ACWI and FTSE All-World indices in magenta. A well-functioning passive fund should perform in line with its benchmark – which this selection does.
In fact, most trackers should lag their index because the fund pays fees whereas the index doesn’t bear that cost.
The iShares and SPDR MSCI ACWI ETFs perform this way. But intriguingly, the HSBC FTSE All-World fund leads its index – suggesting management have got a trick or two up their sleeves.
The FTSE Global All Cap fund follows a different index (not graphed) and has been dragged down by its small-cap shares relative to its rivals.
Over ten years, the HSBC has marginally outperformed the rest. But it hasn’t always. The Vanguard All-World ETF edged it by a nose four years ago.
It could be that HSBC’s significant fee advantage is starting to tell. Or perhaps some other minor variation in their respective holdings means advantage HSBC.
But it’s best not to put too much weight on short-term return results, anyway. They can easily be reversed by market moves.
Stress-free investing
If you’re starting from scratch then by all means choose the HSBC FTSE All-World Index fund.
But there’s no need to switch out of the other top five funds because of the result in the table.
Index trackers are typically cookie-cutter products. Mostly the results just demonstrate our top five all work just fine. They are practically interchangeable.
The fact is we’re not checking performance to crown the one, true, best global tracker fund.
With me-too products, you don’t have to over-optimise. Any candidate from a field of well-matched rivals will probably be good enough.
Our performance check simply ensures that nothing on our shortlist is broken, or isn’t what we think it is.
A world of difference
Here’s a few other things to note.
Fund sizes – All five index trackers in our top table have hundreds of millions in assets under management (AUM). Efficiencies of scale typically kick in above £100 million. Beyond that threshold, size is not a big deal. The iShares ETF is three times the size of the SPDR ETF, but its performance is neck-and-neck over ten years.
Fixed income – The trackers in our table are purely equity funds. Owning additional high-quality government bonds is crucial to help you not to freak out during a stock market crash.
Check out our best bond fund choices to find your fixed-income Venus for your equity Mars.
Understanding how to build your asset allocation will help you work out how much you need to put into such diversifying defensive assets.
Income versus accumulation – All of our best global index tracker picks come in both Inc and Acc flavours, except the iShares and SPDR ETFs. They are only available as accumulating funds.
World and World ex-UK – I excluded these trackers, because it makes no sense to only include the Developed World, or to skip the UK when you’re trying to diversify across the whole world.
K.I.S.S.
The beauty of the single global equity tracker strategy is its simplicity.
Yes, you could shave away a little cost by building a similar portfolio from separate regional trackers.
But is it worth the aggro in time and dealing fees? And can you trust yourself to stick to the global market’s verdict? Or will you justify trimming back on Japan or the US or wherever because you can apparently spot a bubble that everyone else has missed?
Fill your boots if you psychologically need the control. But know that you don’t have to.
Nobody can predict which strategy will win over your investment lifetime. But putting a global tracker fund at the core of your asset allocation is a rational choice in an increasingly insane world.
Take it steady,
The Accumulator



Post Comment