Are GOP Midterm Candidates Reaching a New Level of Radical—And What It Means for America’s Future

Are GOP Midterm Candidates Reaching a New Level of Radical—And What It Means for America’s Future

Ever wonder how democracy actually works when the spotlight dims and the cameras focus elsewhere? Yep, it’s not just about national headlines or flashy political drama — the real magic, the genuine tug-of-war happens quietly in statehouses, utility commissions, and election offices you never hear about. Each week, I dive into the nitty-gritty of what’s unfolding across America’s “laboratories of democracy,” where a single flipped seat can rewrite supermajority math or where secretaries of state become unlikely heroes (or villains) in our ongoing saga. Intrigued by the battle over ballot measures, the rise of tech oligarchies, or a courtroom throwing down on surveillance overreach? Pull up a chair; it’s all happening right under our noses, shaping the future in ways that matter like never before. Buckle up — this isn’t your usual political recap, it’s democracy in action, raw and uncut. LEARN MORE

Estimated read time4 min read

This Week in the Laboratories of Democracy

(Permanent Musical Accompaniment to This Post)

Being our semi-regular weekly survey of what’s goin’ down in the several states where, as we know, the real work of governmentin’ gets done, and where to live outside the law you must be honest.

Our good friends over at Bolts have gifted us with another of their comprehensive guides to all the upcoming elections, large and small. As usual with this feature, all the spotlight races are analyzed, and the most intriguing entries are the downballot ones, including the various state utility commissions.

In Nebraska, Republicans currently enjoy a supermajority in the state’s famous unicameral legislature. Nevertheless, the Democratic minority has been able to throw sand in the gears on several important issues. According to Bolts, all they have to do is flip one seat to eliminate the supermajority, and then they could really have some fun. And with a surprisingly close race for the U.S. Senate, that sounds like there’s a decent chance of that.

And, God knows, we all should be aware by now that secretaries of state are seriously important figures. (And let us bid a grateful farewell to Brad Raffensperger down in Georgia, who is term-limited out of office this time around. He stood up when it mattered.) Keep an eye out for America First SOS candidates. In the 2022 Republican primaries, there were more than a dozen of these jamokes. One of them won the general election in Indiana. They’re all steeped in the big lie about the 2020 election.

Out and out election deniers are the Republican candidates for secretary of state in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada. An exemplar is one Jim Marchant, who is the GOP candidate for secretary of state in Nevada. From The Nevada Independent:

Marchant, with no verified evidence, said the voter rolls “are a huge problem,” and he wants to unregister, then reregister all voters. He also previously floated an idea to verify people’s identities by measuring their heartbeats, but he told The Indy he would not pursue this immediately if elected.

Elect me. I promise I won’t do the nutty stuff straight out of the box. I am not a lunatic.

Meanwhile, Ballotpedia is keeping track of the sudden volatility of the data center as a serious political flashpoint.

In 2026, voters will decide on at least 39 local ballot measures related to data centers in eight states: California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The majority of measures, 35 of 39 (90%), are scheduled for the general election on November 3, with four appearing earlier in the year.

…

Voters in eight states—Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin, Kansas, California, Michigan, Nevada, and Florida — will decide on data center-related ballot measures in 2026, with Ohio accounting for more than half of all measures tracked. Ohio accounts for the largest share of measures—21 of 39, across 18 distinct jurisdictions. Illinois has seven measures, four of which are concentrated in Madison County. The other 11 measures are spread across 6 states: Wisconsin  (3), Kansas (3), California (2), Michigan (1), Nevada (1), and Florida (1).

The eruption of this issue is a remarkable development on many levels. It is a clear look at the power of unaccountable—and, in the case of the rich tech bros, unfathomable—oligarchy. The pushback is the first focused grassroots resistance to oligarchy that we’ve seen in years.

And we conclude, as is our custom, in the great state of Oklahoma, whence Blog Official Iberian Tiger Friedman of the Algarve brings us a tale of Flock flocking by law enforcement. From KOSU:

Tulsa County deputy sheriff Freddie Alaniz was parked on the side of the highway observing traffic when for no apparent reason, he began to follow a driver with a California license plate. He also entered the vehicle’s license plate number into an Automated License Plate Reader system—allegedly before seeing the driver commit any infraction.

Alaniz waited to see the driver commit an infraction before conducting a routine traffic stop. That stop resulted in driver Melisa Kyle being arrested and charged with knowingly possessing 91-pounds of methamphetamine with intent to distribute.

Nope. Sorry, officer. There’s this pesky parchment under glass in Washington that would like a word.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Sara E. Hill ruled Alaniz did not have probable cause when he used the ALPR system to track Kyle’s license plate. Therefore, it was an unwarranted search and a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

“Freedom from persistent, dragnet-style surveillance while in public is not a foreign concept in our society, and it is a reasonable expectation that society already accepts,” the ruling states.

Given the violation, Hill granted the defendant a motion to suppress—meaning any evidence gathered following the ALPR searches is void. “No doubt, ALPR technology comes with remarkable benefits that the Court cannot ignore. But the Fourth Amendment requires courts to draw a line when the cost is too great,” Hill wrote. “All evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree.”

Fruit of the poisonous tree! Jack McCoy, come on down!

This is your democracy, America. Cherish it.

Post Comment