How I Turned $1.885 Million Into an Income Machine in 2026 – And Why You’re Missing Out If You’re Not Paying Attention
Ever wondered what it takes to build a portfolio that not only weathers storms but also quietly grows to nearly $1.9 million SGD without a fuss? Welcome to my Daedalus portfolio update for August 2026, where strategic calm meets smart investing. If you’re like me—wanting steady, inflation-proof income streams that won’t quit even when the financial seas get rough—this is the story you’ll want to sit with. I dive deep into month-over-month changes, dissect multifactor funds across developed and emerging markets, and break down how each segment plays its part in the grand scheme—because knowing “why” is as crucial as knowing “what.” No frantic trading here, just the disciplined dance of systematic, low-cost, passive investing with a splash of active strategy to spice things up. Curious about how this all comes together and what it means for income longevity? Strap in and let’s explore the nuts and bolts behind keeping income steady in an unpredictable world.
img#mv-trellis-img-1::before{padding-top:92.484076433121%; }img#mv-trellis-img-1{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-2::before{padding-top:61.422924901186%; }img#mv-trellis-img-2{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-3::before{padding-top:50.1953125%; }img#mv-trellis-img-3{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-4::before{padding-top:25.627376425856%; }img#mv-trellis-img-4{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-5::before{padding-top:64.546225614928%; }img#mv-trellis-img-5{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-6::before{padding-top:152.62738853503%; }img#mv-trellis-img-6{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-7::before{padding-top:38.553022794846%; }img#mv-trellis-img-7{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-8::before{padding-top:47.089397089397%; }img#mv-trellis-img-8{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-9::before{padding-top:44.492440604752%; }img#mv-trellis-img-9{display:block;}img#mv-trellis-img-10::before{padding-top:40.250965250965%; }img#mv-trellis-img-10{display:block;}
Here is the update for my Daedalus portfolio for Aug 2026. If work is not too busy, I will try to provide an update where possible.
I explained how I constructed this portfolio in Deconstructing Daedalus Income Portfolio and Why I Currently Invest in These Funds for Daedalus. You might not understand what I wrote below if you haven’t read this post.
All my personal planning notes such as income planning, insurance planning, investment & portfolio construction will be under my personal notes section of this blog.


You can also find the past updates similar to this in the personal planning notes section.
Portfolio Change Since Last Update
The portfolio was valued at $1.850 million at the end of July and is at $1.880 million at the end of August.
We reported a portfolio change of 1.6% or $30,000 for August 2026.
The portfolio is valued in SGD because that is the currency that I would most likely be spending on.
As of 5th September 2026, the portfolio is valued at $1.885 million.
Portfolio Attribution – Why did the portfolio do better/worse compare to last month [or a year ago if this is a December update]?
We all want to know what cause the portfolio to do better or worse. If you have just one fund that covers the MSCI World, or you have a bunch of funds, would you know if it did better or worse?
In this section, I try my best to explain the portfolio performance in my way.
Here are the primary security holding returns for the month-to-date and year-to-date for the funds that I own [the top fund table] and reference benchmark ETFs [the bottom Major Index ETF table]:


The table that shows the fund holdings denotes the month-to-date and year-to-date performance of the funds that I own, against Major Index ETFs. The Major Index ETFs is present to compare the performance. Just to be clear, I do not own the major index ETFs and you should see the top table (Fund) as what I own. The bottom table (Major Index ETFs) are benchmark ETFs to provide performance reflections.
The returns of all funds are in USD. This includes the performance of the Dimensional funds, which I use the returns of the USD share class so that the returns are comparable. I have also listed the major index ETF performance for comparison.
a. General Equity Performance
The S&P 500 snapped back from two straight negative months, with technology stocks up 6.25% generating more than three-quarters of the index’s 2.7% monthly return, even as energy’s stronger 7% advance contributed only modestly given its smaller index weight. The rebound was led by a 16% surge in software names, while semiconductors barely held onto a 1% gain for the month despite being up nearly 10% at the midpoint. The index pushed to fresh records above 7,800 early in the month before late-August volatility tied to renewed Iran tensions and a hawkish Fed pulled it back, closing out August at 7,686, with the Nasdaq at 26,370 and the Dow at 53,185.
Under the surface, August was largely a reversal of July’s rotation rather than a continuation of it. Growth reasserted leadership through the month on the back of the software and hyperscaler recovery and stabilizing semiconductors, which had corrected 25% over six weeks from mid-June to late July, with the Russell 1000 Growth Index outpacing Value by 170 basis points (3.7% vs. 2.0%), a pattern that also held among small caps. Japan’s numbers tell a similar story: the Nikkei 225 was up 4% in August alone, actually outperforming the Nasdaq 100’s 2% gain and the S&P 500’s 1.2% gain for the month which is a marked contrast to July’s equal-weight-over-cap-weight dynamic. That said, the equal-weight trade’s longer-run edge stayed intact: the equal-weight S&P 500 had edged out the market-cap-weighted index by roughly 3% year-to-date through August 21, drawing more than $12 billion of inflows this year and pushing assets in that flagship ETF trade above $100 billion for the first time.
Small caps continued grinding higher but at a more muted pace than earlier in the year, with the Russell 2000 pacing to close the month up about 1.4% and still leading the flagship complex year-to-date at +20.2%, alongside the Russell MicroCap Index’s 24% YTD gain.
Europe kept its leadership intact. The Stoxx 600 hit a fresh all-time high in early August, with the five best-performing European stocks of the year all semiconductor-related [ Soitec (+371%), AT&S (+330%), Technoprobe (+123%), Aixtron (+116%) and STMicroelectronics (+101%)]. The index has rallied 11% year-to-date, with the DAX, CAC 40 and FTSE MIB all at record highs and about 75% of Stoxx 600 constituents trading above their 200-day moving average; the Stoxx 600 Banks index is up 22% on the year, while a Bank of America basket of European AI adopters has gained 14%, outperforming a 3% advance in U.S. hyperscalers. The MSCI EAFE gained 2.0% in August, with growth (2.6%) outperforming value (1.5%) within the index and EAFE Small Cap up 3.8%.
The Nikkei remained the standout among major global benchmarks. Its year-to-date gain of 32% is nearly double the Nasdaq 100’s 16% and 2.6 times the S&P 500’s 12%, closing August at 66,311 after briefly plunging more than 1,500 points intraday around Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s hawkish Jackson Hole remarks before recovering almost all of the loss by the close. That resilience came against a genuinely tougher domestic backdrop: the 10-year JGB yield hit 2.93%, its highest since 1996, while the yen weakened to about 160 against the dollar, with markets now pricing roughly 82% odds of a Bank of Japan rate hike at its September 17–18 meeting.
Emerging markets staged the sharpest reversal of the month. MSCI EM gained 3.4% in August, outperforming developed international markets, with China still a drag at -0.3% but far milder than the deflation- and property-driven rout of the prior quarter. Hong Kong stabilized after an earlier bout of tech-driven volatility, with the Hang Seng climbing 0.80% to 25,698 by mid-month as Asian markets broadly rallied on bond-market relief.
b. Developed Equity Performance
There were a few multifactor funds targeting the developed equities region in Daedalus:
| Multifactor Funds in the Developed World Universe | 1-Month Return | YTD Return |
| JPGL | 2.34% | 15.6% |
| GGRA | 2.90% | 9.5% |
| AVGC | 3.71% | 17.1% |
| IFSW | 4.22% | 17.8% |
| Dimensional Global Core Equity (I do not own this) | 2.73% | 15.5% |
| IWDA (MSCI World) | 4.10% | 13.5% |
I hope you look at them as a diversified group of equities that gives exposure to developed large cap and mid cap global equities. They also systematically gives exposure to cheaper and more profitable companies with a little bit of short term momentum.
The overall valuation of this global portfolio segment is lower than the market cap weighted index. The aggregate forward earnings growth of the portfolio should be reasonably high, despite the cheaper valuation.
The main comparison will be against the MSCI World.
All the global multi-factor funds recovered significantly this month even if they don’t feel like it. Except for GGRA, the 3 multi-factor did better than the IWDA year-to-date.
c. Developed + Emerging Markets Equity Performance
The Dimensional World Equity sits as part of my SRS account. It is a single fund that gives exposure to the developed and emerging markets large cap and mid cap stocks.
You should compare this against the MSCI All Country World and MSCI All Country World IMI.
| Multifactor Funds in the Developed World + Emerging Markets Universe | 1-Month Return | YTD Return |
| Dimensional World Equity Fund | 3.04% | 16.8% |
| ACWD (I do not own this) | 4.27% | 14.6% |
| IMID (I do not own this) | 4.25% | 15.3% |
Dimensional World Equity did not do as well as the index-tracking funds but year to date, they have been better.
d. Emerging Markets Equity Performance
AVEM and EMSD is my emerging market exposure. One is a large, mid and small cap fund that should tilt towards value and profitability. The other is a pure emerging market small cap with no factor tilts.
| Multifactor Funds in the Emerging Markets Universe | 1-Month Return | YTD Return |
| AVEM | 6.44% | 21.2% |
| EMSD (small cap) | 11.9% | 15.7% |
| EIMI (I do not own this) | 6.41% | 22.9% |
Large, mid and small cap emerging markets recovered from the poor July. Small caps in particular, showed their greater volatility as small caps but also by virtue of being in the emerging markets.
e. Small Cap Equity Performance.
About 32% of the portfolio or 36.5% of the equity allocation is invested in Global Small Cap Value or Value-weighted funds. You should look at Dimensional Global Targeted Value, AVGS. USSC used to be a significant allocation but no more. I still leave the performance in for this year just so you can contextualize its performance.
| Multifactor Funds in the Small Cap Universe | Region | 1-Month Return | YTD Return |
| USSC (I do not own this) | US | 1.90% | 21.0% |
| AVGS | Global Developed | 3.33% | 23.7% |
| Dimensional Global Targeted Value | Global Developed | 2.20% | 16.5% |
| EMSD | Emerging Mkts | 11.85% | 15.7% |
| Benchmark ETFs | |||
| R2US | Russell 2000 | US | 2.77% | 20.6% |
| USML | S&P 600 | US | 1.20% | 21.0% |
| SPY4 | S&P 600 | US | 1.46% | 14.5% |
| WSML | World Small Cap | Global Developed | 3.97% | 17.6% |
Small Cap stocks rebounded from July as well. The right benchmark measurement for AVGS and Global Targeted Value should be WSML and AVGS did better while Global Targeted Value lagged.
f. Global Aggregate Bond Performance
11.5% of the portfolio is in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU).
The chart below is the US government yield curve at 31st August (Red) and 3rd August (Blue):


The yield curve continue to shift upwards. The AGGU reverse some of July’s losses and is finally positive year to date.
In contrast, the ultrashort bond ETF ERNA did 0.30%, harvesting the yield and not facing any duration risk.
g. Currency Effect
The USD weaken by -0.90% for the month against the SGD.
Since the portfolio is based in SGD, this currency strength positively affects the portfolio.
Role of Portfolio
The goal of the portfolio is to generate steady, inflation-adjusted income to cover my essential living expenses. It’s built using a conservative initial withdrawal rate of 2.0–2.5%, which is designed to hold up even under extremely tough market conditions — including scenarios like the Great Depression, prolonged periods of high inflation (averaging 5.5–6% over 30 years), or major global conflicts. In other words, it’s stress-tested to withstand some of the worst financial environments in history.
The income needs to last: from today (age 45) for the rest of your life — potentially forever.
I am currently not drawing down the portfolio.
For further reading on:
- My notes regarding my essential spending.
- My notes regarding my basic spending.
- My elaboration of the Safe Withdrawal Rate: Article | YouTube Video
Based on current portfolio value, the amount of monthly passive income that can be conservatively generated from the portfolio is


The lower the SWR, the more capital is needed, but the more resilient the income stream is.
Nature of the Income I Planned for
Generally, different income strategies produce different types of income streams. They can vary by:
- Consistency: Some provide steady income, others fluctuate over time
- Inflation Protection: Some adjust with inflation, others remain fixed
- Duration: Some last for a set number of years, others are designed to last indefinitely (perpetual)
An income stream based on the Safe Withdrawal Rate framework is consistent and inflation-adjusted, and if we use a low initial Safe Withdrawal Rate of 2.0-2.5%, the income stream leans towards a long duration to perpetual.
Here is a visual illustration of how the income stream will be based on the current portfolio value:


The income for the initial year is based on a 2% Safe Withdrawal Rate. The income for subsequent years is based on the inflation rate in the prior year (refer to the bottom pane of inflation in the previous year). If the inflation is high, the income scales up and if there is deflation, the income is reduced.
Amount of Cash Flow/Income Withdrawn/Extracted from Daedalus Income Portfolio
I wish to be fully transparent about the schedule of withdrawals from the portfolio because if the goal of the portfolio is eventually or currently provide income for spending, you would be interested to know how much is taken out from the portfolio.
There have not been any withdrawals or cash flow extraction for spending since the publication of the portfolio. I will update as and when it happens.
Capital Injected Into Daedalus
My goal for Daedalus is not to inject capital into the portfolio since its first report in May 2024. One of the reason is to show a portfolio that is buy-and-hold, instead of some weird “war chest market timing” strategy.
Usually the injection is if I have SRS commitments to reduce the tax expense.
Here are my historical Capital Injections to the portfolio:
| Date | Capital Injected | Type |
| 29 May 2024 | $7,000 | SRS |
| 06 Jun 2024 | $3,500 | SRS |
| 23 Jul 2024 | $1,000 | SRS |
| 07 Feb 2025 | $7,500 | SRS |
| 30 May 2025 | $7,500 | SRS |
Investment Strategy & Philosophy
After trying my best to learn how to invest for a while, the portfolio expresses my thoughts about investing at this point.
The portfolio is run in a
- Strategic: allocation doesn’t change by short-term events.
- Systematic: rules/decision-tree-based implemented either myself or an external manager.
- Low-cost: investment implementation cost is kept reasonably low both on the fund level and also on the custodian level.
- Passive: I spend relatively little effort mentally considering investments and also action-wise.
You can read more in this note article: Deconstructing Daedalus My Passive Income Investment Portfolio for My Essential & Basic Spending.
Portfolio Change Since Last Update (Usually Last Month)
There are no portfolio changes for the month.
Current Holdings – By Dollar Value and Percentages
The following table shows more details about the securities that I currently held.
The securities are grouped based on general strategy, whether they are:
- Systematic Passive Fixed Income to reduce volatility.
- Systematic Passive, which are equities that tries to capture the market risk in a systematic manner.
- Systematic Active, which are equities that tries to capture various proven risk premiums such as value, momentum, quality, high profitability, and size in a systematic manner.
- Hard Assets, securities that are more commodities related, that tends to do well in commodities related inflation situations.
- Legacy Tracking Positions, securities that I still keep around, minimized to track their historical performance.


Portfolio Grouped by Account Money Source Location
Generally, you won’t have just one view about the securities in your portfolio.
In the following sections, I show my portfolio when viewed from different angles.


The first is the portfolio based on location.
- Cash means held in accounts that we can make independent choices of which platform that we choose to invest in, when we decide to buy, when we decide to sell without any liquidity, tax, or locking considerations.
- SRS Account is a Singapore-related retirement account. There are tax advantages on your ordinary working income if a person contributes to it. You can defer the income tax until after your retirement, where only 50% of your withdrawal then will be tax, at the prevailing tax bracket then.
This view does nothing much but some might be curious whether it makes up my money in CPF, here or there and so basically these are basically my cash monies and SRS.
Portfolio Grouped by Geographical Region Exposure of Securities


The second view groups the securities based on its geographical exposure.
Returns comes potentially from taking systematic risks and risks comes partly from the macro, interest and inflation exposure in different geographical regions.
The general regions:
- Developed Markets – Strategies that systematically considers the large-cap and mid-cap equities in developed countries. You can view the countries, and sector composition at this MSCI World Index page.
- Global – Strategies that systematically considers the large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap equities in both developed and emerging market countries. You can view the countries, and sector composition at this MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index page.
- US – Strategies that mainly tap small-cap US equities.
Portfolio Grouped by Fund, Cash or Individual Security


The third view groups the securities based on whether they are fund, cash or individual securities.
Almost 100% of the portfolio is implemented with funds. Funds can be:
- Singapore Unit Trusts domiciled in Ireland.
- London Stock Exchange listed exchange traded funds (ETFs) domiciled in Ireland.
Portfolio Grouped by Investment Strategy.


The last view groups the securities based on commonly known high level strategy names.
What Systematic Active Means: Funds that help me execute passively very specific, repeatable underlying securities selection on an ongoing basis. Here are some examples of the systematic active strategies in my portfolio:
- Global Multifactor: From a basket of 1,600 developed market large and mid-cap stocks, rank the stocks by their value, by their 12-month momentum, by their degree of ROE and debt to asset, and then own the top 300. Do this every half-yearly or quarterly. You end up with a strategy that consistently owns 300 companies that are cheaper, quality and have greater momentum relative to a market cap weighted index.
- Small Cap Value: From a basket of 3,000 developed market small cap stocks, rank the stocks based on price-to-book value (include intangibles in the book value). Also rank the stocks by operating earnings minus interest divide by book value. Eliminate the companies with low profitability. What we end up is two group of small cap stocks: The more profitable small caps but not too expensive, and the small caps stocks that are at least profitable but are very cheap. Own the top 30-35% of this cohort consistently. Have a manager that consistently helps me execute this.
In contrast, Systematic Passive are funds that help me track certain benchmark indexes. These indexes can be market-cap weighted, or equal-weighted, and reconstituted periodically so that they mirror the performance of benchmark indexes.
Hard Assets are the funds that provide exposure to energy-related securities.
Systematic Passive Fixed Income main helps damp the volatility of the portfolio. They are maintain based on the historical research that it is better to be less than 100% in equities if your portfolio is meant for income.
The fixed income/cash should not be viewed as a war chest to rebalanced to equity or take profit from equity. This is a strategic long term allocation whose main purpose is to optimized negative sequence of return risks.
The Main Custodians for the Securities in this Portfolio
The current custodians are:
- Cash: Interactive Brokers LLC (not SG)
- SRS: Philips FAME
If you want to trade these stocks I mentioned, you can open an account with Interactive Brokers. Interactive Brokers is the leading low-cost and efficient broker I use and trust to invest & trade my holdings in Singapore, the United States, London Stock Exchange and Hong Kong Stock Exchange. They allow you to trade stocks, ETFs, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account.
You can read more about my thoughts about Interactive Brokers in this Interactive Brokers Deep Dive Series, starting with how to create & fund your Interactive Brokers account easily.


Post Comment