“Management, and the high-priced consultants and lawyers they hire, spend hours preparing the various narratives, tables, and graphs that produce nothing but yawns of disinterest from investors,” Peirce lamented.
Meanwhile, Uyeda said the pay ratio disclosure requirement is one example of a rule that has “dubious purposes.” He said there appears to be “little nexus to investor protection concerns.” Instead, some aspects of the pay ratio rule and the underlying Dodd-Frank statutory provision “seem to have a ‘name and shame’ motivation.”
Post Comment