Women's Lifestyle May 15, 2026 0 Comments

Unlocking NYC’s Dance Secrets: The Untold Moves That Shaped a City’s Rhythm Revealed in This Stunning New Book

Ever wonder how dance could be the heartbeat hidden beneath the sprawling streets of New York City? Rennie McDougall’s new book, Nonstop Bodies: How Dance Shaped New York City, dives deep into this pulsating rhythm, revealing stories etched into the city’s very pavement—stories that survived demolition, gentrification, and time itself. From the legendary Lindy hop at the Harlem Savoy Ballroom to the sweat-soaked beats of disco at the Paradise Garage, McDougall takes us on an intimate journey through the vibrant dance scenes that not only defined eras but also mirrored the city’s relentless spirit of reinvention.

What strikes me most is the way dance isn’t just movement—it’s a living, breathing community constantly negotiating between raw, collective expression and the pressures that try to tame it into mere product or nostalgia. This book isn’t your typical history lesson; it jumps, twirls, and spins through interconnected moments and people, from underground voguing battles to ballet stages, illuminating how dance shapes and is shaped by New York’s dense, chaotic soul. It sparks the question: in an age of digital detachment and relentless change, how can we preserve this physical, communal energy that dance embodies?

If you think dance history is just for the scholars or the performers, think again. McDougall’s vibrant storytelling, backed by rigorous research and firsthand interviews, uncovers a powerful narrative about resilience, politics, and identity that resonates far beyond the city itself. Ready to step into the stories that keep New York dancing non-stop?

LEARN MORE

10 min read

Rennie McDougall’s new book, Nonstop Bodies: How Dance Shaped New York City, is a reminder that the history of dance pulses beneath the pavements of the five boroughs. The Harlem Savoy Ballroom, where the Lindy hop was born in 1928, was demolished long ago to make room for a housing complex, as part of Robert Moses’s “slum clearance” project. NYU’s Palladium Hall stands in the former home of 14th Street’s Palladium Ballroom, where Pedro Aguilar and Millie Donay made the mambo a global sensation in 1947. Eighty-four King Street, where legendary DJ Larry Levan spun disco at vital queer space Paradise Garage in the 1970s, is now a glossy high-rise. It’s easy these days to be cynical, to slip into nostalgia for old New York, especially reading McDougall’s vivid, in-depth record of an art form that mirrors the city’s insistence on reinvention. McDougall aims to keep that past alive—both by making these histories accessible, and by pointing to a vision of community we can still aim to have.

Nonstop Bodies tells the story of dance in the 20th century through interlocking micro-histories—from the Savoy to the Judson Dance Theater to the experimental underground of the East Village—that refuse the traditional way dance is historicized. A dancer-turned-writer from Melbourne, McDougall is interested above all in the political and social contexts of dance, how it is woven into life. Voguing, breaking, and sweaty disco dancing share center stage with famed ballet choreographer George Balanchine, “high priestess” of modern dance Martha Graham, and the minds behind the vanguard steps of West Side Story.

new york, ny february 08 tourists watch street performers on an unseasonably warm afternoon with temperatures reaching near 60 degrees on february 8, 2017 in new york city new york city is preparing for a drastic change in weather as up to 10 inches of snow is currently predicted for thursday photo by spencer plattgetty images

Spencer Platt//Getty Images

Tourists watch a breakdancer perform in 2017

We visit Radio City to peek behind the Rockettes’ mechanical curtain, the Roxy to learn about the origins of hip-hop, the Y where Alvin Ailey debuted Revelations. We see DANCENOISE at the Pyramid Club and Avant-Garde-Arama at PS122. In our conversation, McDougall said that one of the things he learned writing this book is that the “ebb and flow” of the city’s artistic moments helps with all that cynicism and nostalgia. Pyramid Club is still there, reincarnated as Nightclub 101; PS122 is now Performance Space New York.

The tension between a dance form’s living communal core and the forces that flatten it into product, institution, or myth is present in each chapter. McDougall writes that the mambo’s defining feature was “its sense of collective experimentation, of breaking the rules,” while the culture at large, seized by “mambo frenzy” that led to its commodification, debated its definition. The desire to break free “simmered under the surface of the entire country,” he writes—but “only by meeting each other in the room could it truly be expressed.” This is the book’s twinned through-line: the way dance allows us to become one with the collective, to shed our egos, and the inverse, the way it can lose its cultural specificity through mainstreaming and institutionalization. McDougall implies that this back and forth is inseparable, too, from the city—from New York’s density and friction, its migrations and displacements, its bodies in close proximity.

members of the rockettes dance group perform during a liberace concert at radio city music hall, new york, new york, 1985 photo by larry busaccawireimage

L. Busacca

The Rockettes perform at a Liberace concert at Radio City Music Hall, 1985

Nonstop Bodies is a massive undertaking. How did this project come together?

I moved to New York in 2015 as a dancer, working with Juliana May. I had been dancing before that with Lucy Guerin and Chunky Move dance companies in Melbourne. I quickly started writing when I moved here. I did my master’s in journalism at NYU, and worked on one piece about dancers from the Savoy Ballroom still living and dancing in Harlem together. That piece was published in one of the last issues of the Village Voice in 2017. That was the genesis of the idea: looking at dance history specifically tied to New York City and outside of traditional historicizing. I realized very quickly it was going to be a huge undertaking, because I wanted to include all of these different forms of dance and how they were in conversation with each other just through being in proximity in New York City.

It was a lot of time spent at the New York Public Library in their archives, having them pull just endless amounts of material for me, bless them. And doing my own interviews, going through oral histories, watching old videos, to get as close as possible to the original versions of the choreographies. I was trying to balance being able to zoom in and focus on something really specific—a scene with one dancer or one interaction and bring the human stories out—while telling this very big story of the city.

Out of so much, how did you decide what and who to focus on?

Initially I was going with my interests. What do I know already, and what am I interested in learning about? I had some criteria: Does the dance say something about the time or place that these dancers are working in? Does it feel really tied to New York, through a specific community or neighborhood? And does that resonate out in a bigger way? What things are speaking to each other? What does it feel fun to put side by side? A reference point for this book structurally was David Halberstam’s The Fifties, which has these capsule chapters of different figures or events that aren’t connected necessarily. Nixon, Betty Friedan, Levittown, the creation of McDonald’s—when put all together, they tell this much bigger picture of the decade. I started from there—it’s fun to put Martha Graham next to the Rockettes next to the Palladium and mambo, not necessarily to draw out connections.

But then the different chapters did start speaking to each other. Martha Graham shows up in the opening of Radio City with the Rockettes and Balanchine and [his ballet with Igor Stravinsky] Agon. This event of interracial pas de deux in Agon that was a big deal in ballet at the time is happening at the same time as Millie [Donay] and Pedro Aguilar are dancing together at The Palladium. I found that really exciting. There is of course then the nightmare of having to exclude things, and what doesn’t get as much attention. Originally there was an entire chapter about [choreographer Merce] Cunningham. Cunningham is still in the book, and his work is obviously incredibly influential. But once the book started to come together, it felt isolated, like an island on its own. What to include and what not to include were constant dilemmas.

united states july 30 street performers have a readymade audience of tourists waiting to take the boat to the statue of liberty on the next to last day of the hottest july on record photo by evy magesny daily news archive via getty images

New York Daily News Archive

Street performers entertain a crowd waiting to tour the Statue of Liberty, 1999

The political history you portray in this book is really fascinating. How dance is tied up in the Cold War, and nationalist propaganda, how dance was both involved with and displaying politics of the different times.

It’s interesting the way that politics finds its way into or around the work without necessarily being the subject of the work. The book puts concert dance—modern dance and ballet—next to social dance. Those are two very different spheres in terms of how they have been written about and historicized. Concert dance and modernism, and again with postmodernism, there have been ways in which that work tries to sit outside of a political reading—that it’s really about form and the craft of choreography or movement that is not in any direct relationship to a political interpretation. That comes out in the dynamic with the early modernists and the communist dance pageants that were happening at the time. The modernists were moving away from that. So there is a version of these histories that don’t include any kind of political reading at all.

The Judson Dance Theater Group were returning to an essentialness about the moving body and what it can do in performance that frees itself from obvious didactic readings. But there has been a reassessment of the way that whiteness was at play in that work and of the artists’ conception of a “neutral body.” It was the moment of the student protest movement and anti-Vietnam War protests. This anti-establishment energy is totally what informed their interest in rejecting the modern choreo establishment at the time, and moving into a new space. The politics of the time shapes what they’re doing, even if it is purely formal in interest. But, “purely”—that doesn’t really exist.

The writer Mura Dehn, who was writing about the Savoy Ballroom dancers, I found the way she framed her observations really helpful in this context. When she would speak to the dancers about what the dance meant to them, they would talk about their lives and their jobs and everything else that wasn’t the dance. And then they would come back to it as if the dance was the culmination of these other things that were part of their lives. The social influence is maybe more to the point of what I’m trying to talk about—the way that dance is connected to our sociality and the ways that we live our lives that then gets expressed through these dances that aren’t separate, but part of the texture of living. That can be applied to choreographers and modern dance work as well.

George Karger//Getty Images

A couple dancing at the Savoy Ballroom, 1938

In the conclusion you write, “The combines forces of gentrification and increased online existences threaten that essential nature of the city, making it difficult to see one another, robbing our bodies of urgent presence. This must be resisted.” How can we resist?

When I come back to that conclusion now, I think it is already happening. There are so many spaces in the city where people are finding each other. To speak specifically of dance, I was really bummed that by the time the book was all locked I hadn’t yet discovered that Moynihan [Train Hall] has become this rehearsal space. It is just so cool to see, what [the city] can offer us that feels energetic and fresh and new. It’s the effort.

What’s going on in contemporary dance these days in New York?

PAGEANT in Brooklyn has a real energy around it. A lot of artists are gathering there, and there’s a line down the block to get in to see some small piece from an artist who’s just trying things out in the space. I think this city always has these big histories to contend with. [Martha] Graham is a perfect example. It’s the hundredth anniversary of her company this year. There’s a big tour happening, and it’s incredible to be able to see that work. The dancers are unbelievable, completely dedicated to that work and bringing it to life. It’s really special. At the same time, it casts a shadow. We have this attachment to a past and these dance lineages that can live on for a really long time. In order to go somewhere new, you have to break from it and discover new spaces creatively, artistically.

dancers perform during the finite infinite games a film of music, dance, fashion and film premiere at judson memorial church on december 14, 2010 in new york city photo by brian killianwireimage

Brian Killian

A performance at Judson Memorial Church, 2010

There are so many different ways to do nonfiction. Yours is a history, but you can feel your experience and passion as a dancer very clearly in moments, especially when you’re describing movement. Is there decision-making that went into that? Or were you following your flow?

I deliberately didn’t speak directly about my own experiences as a dancer until the very end. I didn’t want to be leaning in like, “By the way, me too.” One of the things that works for me in writing about dance is getting inside the idea of live physicality. Doing that with the language so that you’re not flattening the dance but in conversation with the liveness of it. In each chapter I tried to find the place to do that. At the end of the Savoy Ballroom chapter, there’s a description of one of the women from one of the videos. I was really struck by it when I first saw it, because it looked to me like a version of what Deborah Hay does with improvisation. They’re worlds apart in terms of culture and time. But the sensibilities were the same, these interruptions of flow and this interiority that’s almost operating at a cellular level. My observation of that dance and getting into the minutiae was to bring it to life. But also it is about feeling your way through by observation, shaking off the historicizing as a way of locking it in the past. That was a very conscious choice.

This is what’s so interesting about arts criticism—the intimate act of observation that becomes imbued in the language by way of your engagement with the piece.

There is this interesting dilemma with dance writing: the person writing about it has to conjure it as a memory when they go to write about it. And then that space of, “What do I remember? What have I forgotten? What was I feeling at the time?” That is always present in the way people write about dance. I think it’s much more interesting when the writer addresses that or somehow finds some way to navigate that in their writing, that acknowledgment of the losing of it as it’s occurring. At the same time it can be a trap to give over to the ephemerality too much and not to be like, “Let’s pin this down a little bit.” The book is doing a little bit of both.

It was interesting to me to historicize dance through people’s lives, their social spheres, and the way that those things bled into the dance. Not trying to pin the forms down—“What is this art form? What are its parameters? What can we define it as?”—but letting that go. Let’s talk about when the person stopped dancing, what were they doing directly afterwards, who was that person talking to, and where did that conversation go? It was a way to address this problem of the slipping-away-from-you of dance, the extreme liveness of it, and then the immediate dissolution of it.

Do you think there’s something to learn here, particularly in our current hellishly Trumpian and severely online, pandemic-recovery cultural moment?

The final chapter is about artists in the East Village during the ’80s and ’90s, experimental performance artists who were working in the clubs in the East Village, like DANCENOISE and the artists at PS 122. The political repressions of that time mirror what Trump has created. Specifically in that moment with Reagan and the beginning of the neoconservative agenda, which is the seed of everything that Trump is doing. What Reagan was doing with the NEA [is the blueprint for] what Trump is doing with arts funding and museums and disenfranchising people of color, immigrants, women, any minorities. The community that those artists created in the ’80s and during the AIDS epidemic—because they had established this community, they then had this network of care when all of these artists were dying. That real community-building is where it’s at right now. That’s what I look for. Looking at those moments in history gives you some resolve.